11
Jun

Charles Darwin said that?

   Posted by: Bill   in Reflection

Charles DarwinPoor Charles Darwin – I wonder if even he himself ever imagined how one day he would be a poster child. His name is held in nearly reverential awe by those who deny the existence of a Creator, in favor of a natural process that began by chance and has since continued to derive more information out of less. Proponents spend countless years and equally countless funds in an effort to reverse-engineer the observations recorded by Darwin in his seminal work, “On the Origin of Species”. Their ‘a priori’: no Creator in Darwin’s work, rather “pure science”.

Let us also not forget those who practically spit while uttering this “cursed” name. For many, Darwin represents the core of the ills of society and the detachment of souls from a higher purpose. Darwin has become synonymous with the devaluation of human life, and is blamed as the source of everything from a failing education system to abortion. Just give ‘em their “Old Time Religion” – it’s good enough for them.

To both groups, I offer the following extract from chapter 15 of “On the Origin of Species”. It is the last stanza from the last chapter of this work. Please, consider this if you will:

There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being evolved.

A “Creator” (with a capital ‘C’)?!? Oh yes. As well as “evolved”. The key is the word “forms”.

Sorry folks, Darwin was right in that he reported on his observations, and speculated based on those observations. It is the fault of those who twist his words to support their agendas that his name has become such a hot-button.

Now come on everyone – shake hands and make up.

This entry was posted on Thursday, June 11th, 2009 at 8:34 pm and is filed under Reflection. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 comments so far

SpiegS
 1 

Did You read http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin ?
I will try to quote: ” * There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.
o Close of the First edition. After the controversies generated by his book, the sixth edition here included the phrase “by the Creator” to read:

There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.”
IMHO there ar no further comments required …

June 19th, 2009 at 7:44 pm
 2 

Well SpiegS, you’re certainly correct that in the first edition the word “Creator” did not originally appear in this final paragraph. But the word “breathed” certainly would imply something, don’t you think?

By the way, I think your “humble opinion” that no further comment is necessary is premature. You may be distressed to know that the word “Creator” (with a capital ‘C’) appears elsewhere in the book, even in the first edition, in the paragraph just before the last. I quote from the first edition:

“To my mind it accords better with what we know of the laws impressed on matter by the Creator, that the production and extinction of the past and present inhabitants of the world should have been due to secondary causes, like those determining the birth and death of an individual.” (1859 1st Edition, Chapter 14 paragraph 46)

To your question, no – I didn’t read Wikipedia. I read “On the Origin of Species” in Google Books – the actual work. Have you?

June 26th, 2009 at 6:02 am

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment
Subscribe RSS